Letters to the Editor
The Editor:
I wholeheartedly endorse Chuck Snyder for Superior Court
Judge Position 3. I’ve competed against him in
sports events, had friends come before him in divorce
court, and he was efficient as president of our car club.
He earns everyone’s respect, being a man of integrity
and honor. He listens to reason, is of strong character
and logical.
Experienced? Yes. He’s worked civil and criminal
law as a practicing attorney and received accolades as
Superior Court commissioner for the past 15 years.
He has volunteered and innovated programs like teen court,
juvenile drug court, even helped to improve divorce court.
Remarkable. He is quick to seek solutions, save time, and
improve effectiveness. Results? Good judicial decisions,
fewer teens re-offend, trial backlogs reduced. This is
socially and economically intelligent. These are welcome
in a world of inertia, conflict and chaos.
None of us ever know when we, or someone we love, might
end up in that courtroom as a plaintiff or defendant. I
recommend you vote for Chuck. He is knowledgeable, seasoned,
and looks for the best solutions. He’s one of the
fairest persons I have ever competed against.
Joy Gilfilen
Bellingham
The Editor:
While much has been said during the race for Superior Court
Judge Position 3 regarding the relative importance of
adult criminal trial experience and juvenile justice,
I think it’s important to point out that the better
of a job we do with the juvenile case load, the fewer
adult offenders we are likely to have further on down
the road. In a very real sense, excellence in the administration
of juvenile justice should really be considered preventative
justice.
Chuck Snyder has a stellar record with juvenile offenders
from his 15 years as a Superior Court commissioner, while
at the same time hearing civil and criminal cases daily,
plus initiating creative solutions for streamlining the
judicial process.
If there is a natural transition to becoming a judge, it
most certainly begins with district or superior court commissioner
with a solid focus on juveniles and the many combinations
and permutations of civil law. Chuck Snyder is the only
candidate who has this experience. Any candidate for Superior
Court Judge whose background is limited to criminal advocacy
with no background in juvenile or civil matters will find
themselves unable to keep up with the overwhelming case
load in superior court.
Gary Armstrong
Sedro Woolley
The Editor:
The decision on whether to grant shoreline permits for
the proposed Georgia Strait Crossing (GSX) pipeline is
going before Whatcom County Council on October 26. As
the council sits in quasi-judicial mode on this decision
(passed onto them by the county hearing examiner), the
people can no longer lobby the council with further public
comment. Let’s hope the council acts as responsible,
accountable stewards of our community by rejecting those
permits.
If implemented, the GSX pipeline would open up the serious
probability that a new, unwanted utility corridor could
be established along a designated shoreline of statewide
significance that has considerable seismic activity. It
would potentially threaten our salmon, herring, and shellfish
populations and thereby negatively impact our fisheries – not
only environmentally, but economically. It would set a
dangerous precedent for similar, high-impact developments
in any environmentally critical, sensitive area county-wide.
The council should consider the extremely poor pipeline
safety record of co-developer Williams Company: for example,
in its northwest pipeline, there were two ruptures in 2003
and at least eight other failures or safety incidents between
1992 and 1999 with its other pipelines in the Pacific Northwest.
Following the 1999 Olympic Pipeline explosion (not one
of Williams’ pipelines) in Bellingham, the Washington
State Utilities and Transportation Commission launched
an investigation into pipeline inspection and testing records
of companies operating in the state. Williams came out
at nearly the bottom of the list, having inspected only
17 percent of its system and tested a mere 11 percent.
The council should also be concerned about the “shape-shifting” nature
of this project and that the developers have left open
options for GSX to potentially carry products other than
natural gas (for example, LNG, or liquefied natural gas)
that may be even more hazardous to the environment and
to the safety of people and wildlife.
Again, let’s hope the county council protects the
people, wildlife, pristine environment, and economy of
Whatcom County by rejecting the shoreline permits. What
Williams calls “benefits” (possible tax revenues)
to our county are abysmally terrible trade-offs on our
environment, safety, and economy.
Jo Slivinski, Neighbors for Birch Point
Blaine
The Editor;
Doug Ericksen calls the Washington Commerce Corridor (WCC)
a phony issue. Ironically he sponsored this Washington
House Bill 2222 promoting the groundwork for the 10-lane
highway, rail, pipeline and utility corridor, the largest
public works project in our state’s history. This
$100 billion privatization boondoggle would radically
alter the entirety of western Washington and now he,
the person who designed the scope of study, would have
voters believe that the WCC is inconsequential. Mr. Ericksen
has been backpedaling since last June. From the bill’s
inception, Mr. Ericksen ignored the impacts that the
corridor would have on his precious district, deciding
in advance that the study would not look at the entire
state with regards to our complex transportation issues.
Next, he ensured that the half million dollar commerce
corridor feasibility study would limit public input to
a minimum. Thus far this year only two hours of public
testimony have been conducted. I wonder which is phonier,
the corridor concept with its built-in land grab or the
undemocratic process utilized by this half million dollar
study. I urge you to support Robin Bailey, a more mature
and responsible candidate; this also is a surefire way
to tell the legislature to Can the Corridor.
Jeff Margolis
Deming
The
Editor:
The best way to know what someone is going to do in
the future is to look at what they’ve done in the past,
and when you look at Chuck Snyder’s record over the
past 14 plus years you’ll understand his commitment
to coming up with fresh approaches to streamlining the
judicial system in Whatcom County.
One example of this is Snyder’s creation of teen
court, a model that takes minor offenders and allows them
to be heard and judged by a court and jury of their peers.
Students train and then participate as jurors, bailiffs,
prosecutors and defenders, mentored for these tasks by
local volunteer attorneys.
One of the many positive aspects of this program is that
offenders get the experience of a judgment by their peers,
and the other student participants also learn to develop
trust, respect, and understanding for the judicial system.
Those offenders who pass through this program typically
have a repeat rate of less than 20 percent. This is a
proactive judiciary at its finest.
Teen court is typical of the kind of forward thinking
Chuck Snyder brings to Whatcom County, and with your
help November 2, as judge in Superior Court.
John Ury
Bellingham
The Editor:
A desperate situation exists in Whatcom County that threatens
public health and safety, affects our quality of life
and exposes taxpayers to huge financial risks. The Whatcom
County Jail has been so overcrowded that for over a decade,
officers have not been able to book many categories of
dangerous offenders and must pre-release others.
Offenders who repeatedly drive drunk, break into cars and
cause public disorder cannot be booked either at the time
of their arrest or on outstanding warrants when they fail
to keep court dates. Even when a dangerous offender is
admitted into jail another has to be released to make room.
Overcrowded and understaffed conditions within the jail
have led to the spread of disease both in and out of the
facility.
Multiple consultants (including the United States Department
of Justice) have reported that jail conditions are dangerous
and that even the structural integrity of the building
itself is in question. Millions will need to be spent to
keep it open. Other public funds are expended on a regular
basis defending lawsuits or paying judgements that stem
from overcrowded and inadequate jail facilities and staffing
levels.
Whatcom County Proposition Number One provides both an
interim and long term solution to this problem. A tax of
one dime on $100 in taxable purchases will generate the
funds necessary to correct this situation. Please vote
to approve Whatcom County Proposition Number One.
Bill Elfo
Blaine
The Editor:
I support Chuck Snyder for Whatcom County Superior Court
Judge. We need to elect the best, most qualified candidates
we can as our judicial officials. Experience matters.
Chuck Snyder was an attorney in private practice before
being chosen to be a Whatcom County Superior Court commissioner.
With more than 60 percent of superior court hearings
involving civil (non criminal) matters, it is in our
best interest to select a judge with civil law experience.
I want a judge who has worked with business clients,
with real estate clients, who has real experience with
family law. Chuck Snyder has a broad range of legal experience
and knows how the rest of the judicial system works.
Vote for Chuck Snyder for Superior Court Judge Position
3.
Jane Madden
Bellingham
(Ed Note: A number of other letters were received expressing
support for Chuck Snyder and making similar points as expressed
above; for reasons of space, they have not been included
here.)
The Editor:
From all your friends across the border I wish to express
our sorrow in learning of the passing of mayor Dieter
Schugt.
In my association with Dieter over the past years I found
him to be a gentleman of great humility, but with the political
sense to do and work hard for the citizens of Blaine.
A man of his caliber does not come along often and he will
be missed. My condolences to his family and friends.
Gordon A. Shaffer, past
president, White Rock South
Surrey Chamber of Commerce
The Editor:
This is an allegorical poem. I am fully aware that in this
poem there are certain usages that may cry out for editorial
change such as the modifier “tyrant.” It
is not meant to be a possessive. And I am aware that
a rampart is a fortification.
The Glorious Few
Hail to you
The glorious few
To wear the uniform
You protected our country’s
ramparts
from tyrant fire and storm
You raised high
Our scared banner
And kept us safe from harm
Today’s your day of honor
Our hats are off to you
Today we salute you
You, our glorious few.
George Tranberg
Blaine
The Editor:
One of the recommendations made by the Whatcom County Hearing
Examiner may give those who oppose the GSX project some
reason for optimism. That finding is that the GSX project
is a major development under the definition set by Whatcom
County. That has some important implications:
1. There is no 120-day time limit for the county to consider
the application, thereby ruling against William’s
assertion that the county missed approving the permits
by default.
2. As Williams has not applied for a major development
permit it must now apply in order to have the project considered.
3. Any major development application must go through Whatcom
County Planning which is on record as opposing the project.
4. The resubmission of a new application opens this unnecessary
and controversial project to additional scrutiny by an
increasingly aware and informed public.
If the county council does not just deny the permit on
its current merit, I sincerely hope that it will follow
the law explicitly laid out in the Whatcom County Shoreline
Management regulations requiring Williams to submit a major
development permit application.
Eliana Steele-Friedlob, Smart
Growth Birch Bay
Blaine
The Editor:
A leader must have the ability to set a goal and guide
others toward it. A leader must have the courage to overcome
obstacles and be flexible without sacrificing his principles
and a leader must be responsible and care for those he
leads.
John Hobberlin is a leader. He is a dedicated public servant
who understands the people he represents and why he serves
them. He will always strive to improve the lives of his
constituents, which he does with the understanding that
long-term improvement, while more difficult to accomplish,
is preferable to quick fixes.
John Hobberlin is not a professional politician. He is
a leader and an honorable citizen who steps forward when
needed. He will serve us by doing what is right, rather
than what is politically expedient and he will choose principle
over partnership. John Hobberlin, November 2, 2004.
Ed Magner
Birch Bay
Letters
Policy
The Northern Light welcomes letters to the editor; however,
the opinions expressed are not those of the editor. Letters
must include name, address and daytime telephone number
for verification. Letters must not exceed 350 words and
may be edited or rejected for reasons of legality, length
and good taste. Thank-you letters should be limited to 10
names. A fresh viewpoint on matters of general interest
to local readers will increase the likelihood of publication.
Writers should avoid personal invective. Unsigned letters
will not be accepted for publication. Requests for withholding
names will be considered on an individual basis. Only one
letter per month from an individual correspondent will be
published.
Please
send your letter to:
225 Marine Drive, Blaine, WA 98230 or fax 360/332-2777.
E-mail:editor@thenorthernlight.com
Letters Policy
The Northern Light welcomes letters to the editor; however, the opinions expressed are not those of the editor. Letters must include name, address and daytime telephone number for verification. Letters must not exceed 350 words and may be edited or rejected for reasons of legality, length and good taste. Thank you letters are limited to five individuals or groups. A fresh viewpoint on matters of general interest to local readers will increase the likelihood of publication. Writers should avoid personal invective. Unsigned letters will not be accepted for publication. Requests for withholding names will be considered on an individual basis. Only one letter per month from an individual correspondent will be published.
Please email letters to letters@thenorthernlight.com