|
Tide
turning on manufactured homes?
By
Meg Olson
Public
testimony on proposed manufactured homes regulations wrapped
up on a different note than when the hearing began. The
planning commission public hearing opened on March 22 to
solid support for allowing manufactured homes in residential
neighborhoods but closed April 12 to testimony that they
didnt belong in neighborhoods made up of mostly site-built
houses.
Sprinkling
manufactured homes in various Blaine neighborhoods is not
a good idea, said James Rankin, who was joined by
several other residents and businesses in opposing manufactured
homes on single-family lots throughout the city. We
arent against manufactured homes; they have their
place, said local builder Scott Meaker. We just
dont think that place is as infill in a beautiful
city like Blaine.
Blaine
planning commissioners are considering a trio of proposals
covering a spectrum of possibilities for siting manufactured
homes. The first would allow the creation of manufactured
home subdivisions in the planned residential zone east of
Lincoln Park and north of H Street, which would need to
meet city criteria for a subdivision and in which homeowners
would own the lots. The second possibility is a zoning overlay
that would allow higher density parks west of Harvey Road
and along Peace Portal Drive between the freeway and Drayton
Harbor. The park owner would lease lots to manufactured
home owners. Finally, the planning commission is considering
allowing manufactured homes on all residential lots if they
meet acceptable similarity standards when their
value, quality and aesthetics are compared with neighboring
structures.
While
at the earlier hearing members of the manufactured housing
industry said the homes they sold provided as high quality
a living space as a site-built home, Meaker disagreed. There
are some valid reasons why manufactured homes have a bit
of a reputation, he said.
Meaker,
his partner Kevin Coggan and brother Daniel Meaker, also
a home builder, submitted a series of photos to the commission
illustrating what they see as problems with manufactured
homes. At the top of their list were foundations. Manufactured
homes are supported on a system of jack and a concrete pad.
What looks like a foundation is concrete block skirting
that plays no structural role. This is probably one
of the big reasons very few people attempt to enlarge or
seriously remodel a manufactured home, they wrote
in their brief to commissioners, claiming this limits the
ability of a neighborhood to increase in value through time
due to home improvements.
Because
manufactured homes experience twisting and bending in transport,
Meaker said they are often made with materials that can
withstand the stress - materials commonly found in travel
trailers. Those built with standard home-building materials
often need repairs when they arrive at the site, which in
many cases arent made. He presented a series of photos
of rolling floors, uneven counters, and low-grade building
materials in a manufactured home he recently installed.
Many consumers dont initially recognize all
the quality differences between manufactured homes and stick-built
homes because manufactured homes are displayed very nicely
on the lots, he wrote. Over time they realize
the difference.
Meaker
also said limitations on manufactured home siting were already
in place in other Whatcom County communities. If Blaine
deviates from this precedent the manufactured home dealers
in the area will take advantage of Blaines low priced
lots and do a tremendous amount of infill in the city. The
result will be that Blaines city neighborhoods will,
in the long run, be of lower quality than other incorporated
areas in the county, he said.
The
cities of Bellingham, Ferndale, Everson and Lynden limit
manufactured homes that do not meet Uniform Building Code
standards or have permanent foundations to manufactured/mobile
home parks or subdivisions. Most manufactured homes meet
federal Housing and Urban Development standards but not
the state building code. The community felt that locating
manufactured homes could have a detrimental impact on their
home values, the esthetics, character and quality of their
neighborhoods, said Lynden planner Amy Harksell. In
Sumas, manufactured homes are only allowed in low-density
residential areas, with only one unit allowed per 1.5 acres,
said city superintendent Rod McFadden. People felt
it decreased the value of existing neighborhoods,
he said.
In
unincorporated areas of Whatcom County and the city of Nooksack,
manufactured homes are allowed in all residential areas
and subject to the same placement standards as site-built
homes. So far its worked out, said Nooksack
public works director Dale Cline.
Representing
the Washington Manufactured Housing Association, Bob Schoos
urged city planners to find a place for manufactured housing
in Blaine. There is a balance between giving people
a choice in housing and maintaining the value and continuity
of your neighborhoods, he said. Schoos cautioned that
manufactured homes meet federal housing standards, and so
cannot be excluded or restricted for safety or construction
reasons - only as part of the citys effort to control
land use. The way this is drafted youll find
you can give choice to your constituents and protect the
value of your neighborhoods, he said, encouraging
commissioners to approve all three proposals.
Rankin
said the standard of acceptable similarity would
not provide consistency if manufactured houses were allowed
as infill. It would be difficult to define what is
comparable to site-built neighboring houses, he said.
Rankin also suggested manufactured home parks not be allowed
in the southern proposed area along Peace Portal Drive.
This is the place people will get their first impression
of our city and we want that to be favorable, he said.
There
seems to be a general agreement among land-use committee
members about the first two proposals but a great deal of
disagreement on infill in residential areas, said
land-use committee chairman Ken Trupp at the close of the
public hearing. The committee met again to discuss the proposals
this week and will present their recommendation to the full
planning commission April 26.
Back
to Top
|